Editorial of the Day: The Issue of Genocide and the World Court

Editorial of the Day (25th Jan): The Issue of Genocide and the World Court

This editorial covers the initiation of legal action by South Africa against Israel at the International Court of Justice concerning the Gaza conflict.

Table of Contents

Context: The initiation of legal action by South Africa against Israel at the International Court of Justice concerning the Gaza conflict represents a significant examination of the ‘rules-based international order’.

Background

On December 29, 2023, South Africa filed a case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), claiming Israel’s military actions in Gaza breached the Genocide Convention. The ICJ conducted a hearing for “provisional measures” on January 11-12, 2024, allowing both nations three hours to argue their positions. A decision on the provisional measures by the ICJ is pending.

Israel And South Africa: Arguments

South Africa’s Arguments:
- Loss of life: Highlighting the significant number of Palestinian casualties, particularly children, during Israeli operations in Gaza.
- Forced displacement: Accusing Israeli forces of destroying Palestinian homes and displacing residents.
- Humanitarian restrictions: Pointing to the blockade on essential supplies like food, water, and medical aid in Gaza.
- Threat to maternal health: Raising concerns about measures hindering access to healthcare crucial for pregnant women and infants.
Immediate Demands:
- Emergency order: Requesting the ICJ to issue “provisional measures” to prevent further harm to Palestinians before the main case unfolds.
- Protecting Palestinian rights: Arguing that such measures are vital to safeguard Palestinians against ongoing violations of the Genocide Convention.
Israel’s Counter Arguments: Israel contended that there was no legal dispute warranting ICJ intervention and that the cited statements could be interpreted differently.
- Israel maintained that its military actions were aimed solely at neutralising Hamas, arguing that this was in line with international humanitarian law, especially in response to Hamas’ attacks, which resulted in significant casualties and hostages.

We’re now on WhatsApp. Click to Join

Global Reaction

Supporters: Malaysia, Turkey, Jordan, Bolivia, Maldives, Namibia, Pakistan, Colombia, Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC).
Silence: European Union (EU).
Opposition: Israel, US (claims allegations unfounded), UK, France (threatens non-compliance).

Alternatives and International Legal Proceedings Regarding Gaza

Proposed Solutions: Various solutions have been suggested to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, including:
- Forcing Israel to permit the entry of food and essential supplies to prevent famine.
- Implementing a humanitarian ceasefire.
- Instructing Israeli officials to stop making statements that could be perceived as genocidal.
ICJ’s Authority: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has the autonomy to establish its own interim measures, which may extend beyond the requests made by the involved parties.
Multiple Legal Forums: The ICJ isn’t the sole platform for legal proceedings related to the Gaza situation. While Israel faces charges at the ICJ, Hamas, as a non-state entity, cannot be tried there.
Role of the ICC: Both Hamas and Israeli officials could potentially face legal actions at the International Criminal Court (ICC), a separate entity from the ICJ. The ICC has the jurisdiction to investigate crimes in the Palestine/Israel region, which has already been initiated, but no further actions have been taken yet.