Taank Kingdom (6th AD – 8th AD)
Feature | Details |
---|---|
Period | 6th AD – 8th AD |
Geographical Location | Covered parts of northern Punjab, including present-day Pakistan and India |
Capital | Sialkot |
Mention in Historical Records |
|
Political Structure |
|
Strength of Rule |
|
Economy |
|
Society & Culture |
|
Military & Defense |
|
Influence & Relations |
|
Decline |
|
Legacy |
|
The “Taki” kingdom is mentioned by the Chinese traveler Hiuen-Tsang (Xuanzang) during his visit to India between 631-643 A.D. He described it as being located east of Gandhara and referred to it as “Tekka,” while the Chach Nama (a historical account of Sindh) mentions it as “Tak.” The earliest Muslim reference to the kingdom comes from a merchant named Sulaiman, who visited the region before 851 A.D. and recorded it as “Táfak.” Later, in 915 A.D., the Arab historian Al-Masudi referred to it as “at-Tákin” in connection with the hills of Punjab. Scholars have interpreted the name differently—Sir Henry Elliott read it as “Tákin,” while Gildemeister, in his extracts from Masudi, recorded it as “Táfan.”
The Taki kingdom ruled the Punjab region during the 6th and 7th centuries, as evidenced by Xuanzang’s chronicles and other historical accounts. Its capital was Sialkot, a prominent city in the region.
Around 851 A.D., Sulaiman described the kingdom as “Taank,” a name confirmed by historian Sir Alexander Cunningham. He portrayed its rulers as weak and lacking significant power, noting that the kingdom was under the influence of neighboring rulers. Additionally, he mentioned that the region was known for possessing “the finest white women in all of the Indics.” Ibn Khordadbeh, who died in 912 A.D., ranked the king of the Taki confederacy just below the Balhara in prominence. Furthermore, the historian Kazwini mentioned a fort named Taifand, which is believed to correspond with the hill of Sangala, near modern-day Sialkot.