Context: Elon Musk-owned X (formerly Twitter) has challenged the Indian government’s use of Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act, 2000 to moderate and remove content on social media.
What is Section 79 of IT Act?
Section 79 of the Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000 provides “safe harbour” protection to intermediaries (such as social media platforms, search engines, and internet service providers).
Safe-Harbour Protection
- It is a legal framework that shields intermediaries (such as social media platforms, online marketplaces or hosting services) from being held liable for the content uploaded by their users, as long as they comply with certain conditions.
- Eg. Wikipedia, Google, Facebook etc.
Key Provisions of Section 79
- 79(1): Exemption from Liability: Intermediaries shall not be held liable for content posted by users unless they are involved in modifying or creating the content.
- 79(2): Conditions for Safe Harbour Protection: The intermediary must act as a passive conduit (i.e., not modify or curate content). It should follow the provisions of laws and IT rules.
- 79(3): Exceptions to Safe Harbour Protection: Safe harbour does not apply if:
- (3)(a) The intermediary is actively involved in publishing, modifying, or selecting the content.
- (3)(b) The intermediary fails to remove content after receiving actual knowledge or a government/court order.
SC directive in Shreya Singhal on Section 79(3)(b) |
The Supreme Court limited the scope of Section 79(3)(b), ruling that: Content removal orders must come from a court or government notification based on Article 19(2) grounds.
Government’s October 2023 Directive & Sahyog Portal
|