Table of Contents
Context: More than half — 16 — of India’s 30 national sports federations lack an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), mandatory under the 2013 PoSH Act, as highlighted in the Mary Kom-led government committee’s report.
We’re now on WhatsApp. Click to Join
POSH Act Overview
- The “POSH Act” in India refers to the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
- Bhanwari Devi Incident (1992): Bhanwari Devi, a social worker with Rajasthan’s Women’s Development Project, was gang-raped for trying to stop a child marriage.
- Supreme Court 1997/Vishakha Guidelines (Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan case in 1997):
- Following pleas against the crime, the Supreme Court recognized the lack of laws against sexual harassment at workplaces.
- The Court established guidelines to address this gap until relevant legislation could be passed.
- Sources for the Guidelines:
- Article 15 of the Indian Constitution, which prohibits discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, and place of birth.
- International conventions, notably the CEDAW General Recommendations, which India ratified in 1993.
- The Prevention of Sexual Harassment (PoSH) Bill:
- Introduced by the Ministry of Women and Child Development in 2007.
- Underwent several amendments before being enacted by Parliament on December 9, 2013.
Procedure Under Prevention of Sexual Harassment (PoSH) Act
Prevention of Sexual Harassment (PoSH) Act |
|
Definition of Sexual Harassment | Under the 2013 law, sexual harassment includes “any one or more” of the following “unwelcome acts or behaviour” committed directly or by implication:
Additionally, it also lists down five circumstances that would constitute sexual harassment if they are connected to the above-mentioned acts:
|
Coverage | Applies to all workplaces and covers all women, irrespective of their age or employment status. |
Committees |
|
Role Of ICC And LCC |
|
Procedure For Complaint Under The Act |
|
Actions After The ICC Report |
|
Challenges To Implementation Of POSH Act
- Inaccessibility in Informal Sector: The law is difficult to access for women in the informal sector, where over 80% of India’s female workforce is employed.
- High Rate of Underreporting: Factors like organisational power dynamics, fear of losing jobs, and the absence of tangible evidence contribute to significant underreporting.
- Gaps in ICC Formation: As seen with 16 out of 30 national sports federations, many organisations have not established an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC).
- Flaws in ICC Composition: Many ICCs suffer from having too few members or missing a mandatory external member.
- Unclear Legal Guidelines: There’s ambiguity in the law about conducting inquiries and a lack of awareness among women employees on how to report harassment.
Supreme Court Directions on POSH Act Implementation (Oct 2023)
- Appointment of ‘District Officer’: The Supreme Court emphasised the mandatory appointment of a ‘District Officer’ in each state and union territory as per Section 5 of the POSH Act.
- Time-Bound Assessment for Committees: The SC directed the Union of India, state governments, and union territories to conduct time-bound assessments to ensure the formation of Local Committees (LCs) and Internal Committees (ICs) across ministries, departments, organisations, and public sector undertakings.
- Capacity Building Initiatives: The Court advised regular orientation programs, workshops, and awareness campaigns to improve the expertise of LC and IC members.
Justice Verma Committee Recommendations
- Proposed establishing an employment tribunal instead of an ICC for addressing workplace sexual harassment.
- Suggested that the committee may adopt its own procedures for expedient complaint resolution.
- Recommended including domestic workers under the Act’s protection.
- Advised against penalising women for false complaints, to preserve the law’s objective.