Home   »   Current Affairs 2024   »   ECI and MCC

Editorial of the Day (24th May): ECI and Model Code of Conduct (MCC)

Context: There have been complexities and challenges associated with ensuring fair and truthful conduct during elections in India.

Introduction

  • National Motto: “Satyameva Jayate” (“Truth alone triumphs”) from the Mundaka Upanishad was adopted as India’s national motto on January 26, 1950.
  • Election Commission of India (ECI):
    • The ECI was established a day before India became a Republic.
    • Its primary role is to facilitate democratic elections, ensuring a level playing field for candidates and political parties by preventing undue influence through money, muscle power, or falsehood.

Role of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC)

  • Implementation and Expectations:
    • The MCC is designed to ensure fair conduct during elections by instilling a sense of self-restraint among candidates.
    • Adopted with the expectation that candidates will project exemplary behaviour, as outlined in the Manual on MCC published during the General Elections in March 2019.
Model vs. Moral Code
  • Some argue why the MCC is termed a “model” code instead of a “moral” code.
  • Morality is often subjective and involves deeper intent, which can be difficult to discern and prove.
  • Law examines mens rea, the motive behind actions, to determine guilt, while morality concerns deeper, sometimes hidden, intentions.
  • Immanuel Kant noted, “In law, a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics, he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so.”

Contributions and Challenges of MCC

  • The MCC is designed to ensure fair conduct during elections by preventing undue influence through money, muscle power, or falsehood.
    • Despite its implementation, the MCC faces challenges in instilling genuine self-restraint among political candidates, who often face dilemmas between lying to others and themselves.
Mahabharata Story Reference
  • The story of Yudhistra and Dronacharya in the Mahabharata illustrates the complexity of truth and morality.
  • Yudhistra’s partial truth about Ashwathama’s death led to Dronacharya’s withdrawal from battle and subsequent death, illustrating the loss of moral high ground despite technical truthfulness.
  • Provisions Against Hate Speech: The MCC and legal frameworks (Indian Penal Code Section 123(3&3A) and Section 125 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951) prohibit appeals to caste or communal feelings for votes.
    • Such appeals must explicitly relate to voting to be considered corrupt practices or electoral offences.
  • Enforcement Challenges: Clever phrasing allows politicians to circumvent these laws, complicating enforcement.

Conclusion: Rethinking the MCC

  • The Mahabharata story underscores the need to rethink and reboot the MCC and our conscience.
  • Emphasised the importance of maintaining moral integrity in democratic processes to avoid long-term damage beyond elections.

Sharing is caring!

About the Author

I, Sakshi Gupta, am a content writer to empower students aiming for UPSC, PSC, and other competitive exams. My objective is to provide clear, concise, and informative content that caters to your exam preparation needs. I strive to make my content not only informative but also engaging, keeping you motivated throughout your journey!