Home   »   Indian Polity   »   Delimitation

Delimitation: Issues, Legal and Constitutional Basis for Delimitation

Context: There has been a renewed debate about delimitation after the issue was raised by the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu. The debate on fresh delimitation of legislative constituencies has intensified, raising multiple concerns and possible solutions.

The debate over delimitation and financial devolution has sparked controversy in Parliament and several State Assemblies, raising concerns about its impact on the federal structure of the nation.

More In News

  • A proposed solution suggests freezing the number of parliamentary seats but increasing the number of Assembly seats in States with growing populations.
  • This is considered more democratic because:
    • MLAs are the first point of contact for constituents.
    • MPs represent their constituents at the national policy level.

What is Delimitation?

  • Delimitation is the process of redrawing boundaries of Parliamentary and Assembly constituencies to ensure equal representation based on population changes.
  • It also involves fixing the number of seats allocated to each state in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies.
  • The process is carried out by an independent body called the Delimitation Commission.

Importance of Delimitation

  • Ensures Equal Representation: Each constituency should have roughly the same population size to ensure fair voting power.
  • Reflects Population Growth Trends: Helps in adjusting representation as populations increase or decrease over time.
  • Prevents Political Imbalance: Without delimitation, some areas may have more MPs per voter, leading to under-representation
Legal and Constitutional Basis for Delimitation
  •  Article 82: Requires Parliament to revise the allocation of Lok Sabha seats among states after every Census.
  • Article 170: States that the number of seats in State Legislative Assemblies must also be readjusted.
  • Delimitation Act: Passed whenever delimitation is needed, and a Delimitation Commission is set up.
  • Till date, 4 Delimitation Commissions have been formed in 1952, 1963, 1973 & 2004. (UPSC Prelims 2024)

Related Constitutional Amendments

  • 42nd Amendment (1976): Froze the number of Lok Sabha and Assembly seats until the 2001 Census to encourage population control.
  • 84th Amendment (2002): Extended the freeze until 2026.

History of the Delimitation Exercise in India

  • The delimitation of parliamentary constituencies in India has been linked to population growth.
  • From 1951 to 1971, the number of Lok Sabha seats increased in response to population growth. The population per Lok Sabha seat rose from 3 lakh in 1951 to 10.1 lakh in 1971, when the number of seats reached 543.
  • However, in 1976, the number of seats was frozen based on the 1971 Census to encourage population control measures.
  • This freeze was extended until 2026, and with that deadline approaching, the need for revisiting seat allocation has sparked concerns, especially among southern states that have successfully controlled population growth.

Delimitation Commission: Composition and Powers

  • It is a temporary body set up by the Government of India whenever delimitation is required.
  • Delimitation Commission’s orders are laid before the Lok Sabha and the legislative assemblies concerned, but they cannot affect any modifications in the orders. (UPSC Prelims 2012).

Composition

  • A retired/working Supreme Court judge (Chairperson)
  • Chief Election Commissioner
  • State Election Commissioners of the concerned states

Powers and Functions

  • Redraws constituency boundaries based on the latest Census data.
  • Allocates seats fairly among states and constituencies.
  • Consult political parties and stakeholders before finalizing boundaries.
  • Decisions cannot be challenged in court (Article 329).

Issues with Delimitation

  • Uneven Population Growth: Northern states like UP, Bihar, MP, and Rajasthan have seen higher population growth compared to southern and smaller northern states, leading to potential disparities in seat allocation.
  • Disproportionate Representation: If seats are redistributed based on projected population, Southern states and smaller Northern states may lose their relative share in Parliament, reducing their political influence.
  • Threat to Federalism: A decline in proportional representation for some states could undermine the federal structure and create regional imbalances.
  • Uncertainty in Seat Distribution Formula: Lack of clarity on whether seat allocation will be based on existing share or projected population raises concerns about fairness in representation.
  • Political Discontent: States that have successfully controlled their population may feel penalized for their efforts, leading to dissatisfaction and political friction.

Key Concerns with Delimitation

Disproportionate Political Representation

  • Northern states (Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh) have experienced higher population growth than southern states (Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka).
  • If representation is based purely on population, southern states may lose seats, while northern states may gain more, raising concerns over fair political representation.

Financial Devolution Imbalance

  • The 15th Finance Commission shifted from using 1971 Census data to 2011 Census data for devolution, increasing the weightage of the population from 15 to 0.27.
  • Southern states, despite better governance and lower fertility rates, may receive less financial allocation, while high-population states benefit more.

Per-Capita Standardization Issue

  • Using a raw population count to allocate resources and seats ignores regional differences, such as population density, economic development, and governance quality.
  • This could penalize states that have controlled population growth while rewarding those with higher fertility rates.

Complexities of Reservation

  • Delimitation must also consider caste-based and gender-based reservations.
  • A simple population-based formula may not adequately represent marginalized groups.

Concerns of Southern States and Possible Solutions

  • Southern States fear power imbalance due to fresh delimitation, which may reduce their political influence.
  • Suggested solution: Redistribute Rajya Sabha seats equally among the five geographic zones:
    • Northern, Central, Eastern, Western, and Southern zones.

Status of Zonal Councils

Most Zonal Councils have not met since 2023.

  • Exception:
    • Western Zonal Council met in February 2025.
    • Southern Zonal Council last met in 2022 (planned meeting in January 2025 in Chennai).

Role of Zonal Councils

  • Initially meant for resolving inter-state disputes.
  • They now handle broader governance issues (e.g., Aadhaar, good governance).
  • Suggestion:
    • Free zonal councils from the Home Ministry.
    • Strengthen coordination with the Inter-State Council (dormant since 2016).

Major Risks from Delimitation

  • Political Imbalance: Power shift toward large northern States → Weakens influence of more developed States.
  • Communal Division: Religious-based electoral boundaries → Deepens social divisions.
    • Eg., Jammu and Assam delimitations show bias towards creating smaller population constituencies to benefit majoritarian communities.
Lessons from Recent Delimitation Exercises
Jammu and Kashmir Delimitation (2022)

  • Impact:
    • Jammu gained 6 seats; Kashmir Valley gained 1 seat → Created voting imbalance.
      • E.g., a Jammu elector’s vote = 1.2 times the value of a Kashmir Valley elector’s vote.
    • Creation of new constituencies with no administrative/geographic logic:
      • E.g., Jammu’s Poonch and Rajouri added to Kashmir Valley’s Anantnag Lok Sabha seat – geographically distinct (Pir Panjal range vs. Jhelum valley).
  • Allegations of communal demarcation: 6 new constituencies (Jasrota, Ramgarh, Ramnagar, Vaishno Devi, Padder-Nagseni, Doda West) → Hindu majority.
    • Kishtwar (Muslim majority) → Turned into a Hindu majority by merging with Hindu-dominated areas.
    • Population imbalance:
      • Vaishno Devi, Padder, and Doda West → Electorates of 50,000.
      • Muslim-majority Dooru and Surankote → Electorates of 1.92 lahks and 1.77 lahks respectively.

Assam Delimitation (2023)

  • Assembly seats were frozen but the Assam Cabinet merged districts, reducing the number from 35 to 31.
  • Consequences:
    • Loss of 10 Muslim-majority constituencies:
      • South Salmara, two seats in Barpeta, Darrang, Nagaon, Dibrugarh, Sibsagar, Jorhat, Hailakandi, and Karimganj.
    • Increased representation of Hindu and tribal seats.
    • Created constituencies of vastly different population sizes.

Solutions for Balanced Delimitation

  • Expanding Lok Sabha Strength: Given India’s growing population, capping representation at 543 seats is outdated.
    • If past trends are followed, the total seats should increase to 753 by 2026, ensuring fairer representation.
  • Balancing Representation via Population Density: Instead of absolute population, using population density (people per sq. km) can ensure a fair distribution of seats.
    • This method is already used in the Northeast, where states with smaller populations have higher representation.
  • Demographic Performance-Based Allocation: Just like the 15th Finance Commission, delimitation should reward states with better population control by ensuring they do not lose political representation.
  • Weighted Representation Formula: A hybrid approach considering population size, density, demographic progress, and governance indicators can help balance regional disparities.
  • Reforming Financial Devolution: Fiscal transfers should not solely depend on population size.
    • States that have managed their population growth well should receive incentives instead of being penalized.
  • Addressing the Per-Capita Hangover: Moving beyond per-capita measures and incorporating regional needs, economic performance, and demographic attributes will ensure equitable financial and political distribution.

Conclusion

  • A purely population-based delimitation will create a political power imbalance.
  • Communal demarcation of constituencies will lead to polarization and threaten the foundation of India’s pluralistic federalism.
  • Both trends constitute a serious challenge to the unity and integrity of India.

Sharing is caring!

About the Author

I, Sakshi Gupta, am a content writer to empower students aiming for UPSC, PSC, and other competitive exams. My objective is to provide clear, concise, and informative content that caters to your exam preparation needs. I strive to make my content not only informative but also engaging, keeping you motivated throughout your journey!