Blood Money, Contemporary Applications and India’s Stand

The concept of ‘Blood Money,’ known as diya in Islamic Sharia law, is a compensation mechanism aimed at alleviating the suffering of a victim’s family. It has been brought into focus recently due to a high-profile case involving a nurse from Kerala sentenced to death by a Yemen court for the murder of her business partner. This case has spurred debates about the application and implications of blood money in contemporary legal systems.

What is ‘Blood Money’?

• Definition: Blood money, or diya, is a form of compensation paid by a perpetrator to the victim’s family as a part of Islamic legal traditions.
• Purpose: The primary goal is to offer financial relief to the victim’s family, addressing their loss and suffering rather than assigning a monetary value to human life.
• Applicability:
  • Predominantly used in cases of unintentional murder or culpable homicide.
  • In instances of intentional murder, if the victim’s family opts for reconciliation instead of seeking qisas (retribution), diya may be paid.
• State Involvement: Despite reconciliation and payment of diya, the state or community can still impose additional penalties on the offender.

Contemporary Applications in Islamic Countries

• Saudi Arabia:
  • Blood money is commonly used in road accidents and workplace incidents.
  • Sharia courts determine the compensation amount, with police assessing culpability.
• Iran:
  • The compensation amount varies based on the victim’s gender and religion.
  • Typically, the diya for women is half that for men.
• Yemen:
  • In Yemen, the involved parties can reach a consensus on compensation, which is then subject to judicial oversight to ensure fairness.

Historical Practices Similar to Blood Money

• Ireland:
  • The Éraic (body price) and Log nEnech (honor price) under Brehon law in the 7th century AD involved compensating victims’ families based on the social status of the victim.
• Wales:
  • The Galanas system determined compensation according to the victim’s social standing.
• Germany:
  • The concept of Wergeld was formalized in early medieval Germany, outlining compensation for various offenses.

India’s Stand on ‘Blood Money’

India does not have a direct provision for blood money within its legal system. However, a comparable concept exists in the form of plea bargaining.

• Plea Bargaining:
  • Introduced through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005.
  • Allows defendants to plead guilty to lesser charges or receive reduced sentences in exchange for concessions.
• Limitations of Plea Bargaining:
  • Applicable only to offenses punishable by imprisonment of less than seven years.
  • Not applicable to crimes against women, children, heinous crimes, or socio-economic offenses.
  • Victims may receive compensation under Section 265E, but this is distinct from the diya system as it does not focus on reconciliation or out-of-court settlements.

Conclusion

The concept of blood money underscores a restorative approach to justice in certain legal systems, focusing on reconciliation and financial restitution. While India’s legal framework does not accommodate blood money, mechanisms like plea bargaining offer a limited form of negotiated justice. The ongoing debates and efforts in the case of the Kerala nurse highlight the complexities and cultural differences in justice systems worldwide.

Ready to turn your UPSC dreams into reality? Join the trusted StudyIQ UPSC Foundation P2I Live Hinglish Batches today! Our expert-led courses are designed to build a solid foundation while keeping you updated with the latest exam trends. Contact us now to enroll and get one step closer to cracking the UPSC exam with confidence

Sharing is caring!