Focus on Quality of Teaching, Not in 3-Language Formula

Context: Tamil Nadu has long refused to adopt the three-language formula, preferring a two-language policy.

How Language Was Perceived Post-Independence

Language as a Tool for National Integration

After Independence, policymakers viewed language as a critical element for fostering national unity.

Debate on National and Official Language

• The Constituent Assembly debated whether India should have a single national language.
• Hindi was considered by some as the unifying language, but its multiple dialects and regional resistance made consensus difficult.
• Eventually, English was retained as an associate official language alongside Hindi.

Education and Language Policy

• Language was primarily seen as a medium of instruction, not as a cognitive tool for children’s learning.
• Early policymakers believed English would gradually lose prominence, but the opposite happened.
• The dominance of English-medium private schools grew over time, contrary to initial expectations.

Tamil Nadu’s Concerns with the Three-Language Formula

• Historical Opposition: Tamil Nadu has followed a two-language policy (Tamil and English) for decades, rejecting the three-language formula.
• Fear of Imposition of Hindi: The state perceives the three-language formula as a way to push Hindi onto non-Hindi-speaking regions.
  • The anti-Hindi agitation of the 1960s remains a strong political and cultural memory in Tamil Nadu.
• Lack of Reciprocity in the Hindi Belt: Tamil Nadu argues that northern states do not implement the policy in spirit, as they do not introduce South Indian languages like Tamil, Telugu, or Kannada in schools.
  • Example: Schools in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh do not offer Tamil or Punjabi as a third language.
• Continued Resistance: Given these concerns, Tamil Nadu is unlikely to change its stance on the issue.

Focus on Quality of Teaching, Not on the Three-Language Formula

• Issue of Poor Teaching Standards: The real challenge is not the number of languages taught but the quality of language education.
  • Language teaching in schools has suffered due to outdated methods and poor teacher training.
• English Education Crisis: Several states have introduced English from early grades, but teacher proficiency remains low.
  • Andhra Pradesh, despite making English the medium of instruction, struggles with teacher competency.
• Hindi and Other Indian Languages Also Suffer: Hindi is treated more as a cultural symbol than as a functional language for learning.
  • Many regional languages face similar issues within their states.
• Declining Reading Habits: Schools fail to create habitual readers, leading to a broader decline in language skills.
  • Despite early reading being a focus, students are not encouraged to explore literature beyond textbooks.
• Need for Teacher Training and Curriculum Reform: Improving the training of language teachers is more critical than imposing new language policies.
  • Reviving institutions that once provided quality training, like Hyderabad-based English institutes, could help address the issue.

Conclusion

The real challenge in language education is not the number of languages taught but the quality of instruction. Tamil Nadu’s opposition to the three-language formula is rooted in historical resistance to Hindi imposition, while the broader issue across India remains the poor standards of language teaching. Instead of policy battles, efforts should focus on enhancing teacher proficiency, curriculum quality, and student engagement with languages.

Sharing is caring!